The Hidden Concentration Risk in Popular Global ETFs

Market analysts are raising significant concerns about the iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH), a fund widely promoted as a diversified approach to global equity exposure. Upon closer examination, this investment vehicle appears heavily concentrated in just a handful of massive technology corporations, presenting substantial risk factors for investors.

Recent market movements, largely propelled by technology sector performance, have brought the construction methodology of these broadly marketed funds under increased scrutiny. The ETF’s performance trajectory remains closely tied to macroeconomic developments across the United States, Europe, and Japan, while simultaneously facing overwhelming influence from large-cap technology stocks.

Portfolio Dominance by a Select Few

A detailed review of the fund’s holdings reveals a troubling reality: a small collection of prominent technology and growth stocks command disproportionate weight within the portfolio. This concentration creates substantial vulnerability for investors, as the performance of these select companies wields excessive influence over the ETF’s overall returns.

The ten largest positions account for a remarkably significant portion of the total fund assets, highlighting the inherent concentration risk embedded within market capitalization-weighted indexing strategies. As of early October 2025, technology behemoths continue to occupy the leading positions within the portfolio.

Should investors sell immediately? Or is it worth buying iShares MSCI World ETF?

While the fund’s substantial allocation toward U.S. equities positions it advantageously during American market upswings, this same characteristic renders it particularly susceptible to volatility originating from those markets.

Questioning the Diversification Promise

The fund’s marketing often emphasizes broad geographical diversification, yet its actual implementation tells a different story. The market capitalization weighting methodology inevitably results in a small number of corporations exerting decisive influence over the entire fund’s performance.

Investors should maintain clear awareness of this structural reality: behind the appearance of global diversification lies significant dependence on a narrow segment of U.S. technology giants.